FBI Next Generation Identification (NGI)

FY2014 Edition

The following provides a history of changes to this investment's Evaluation (By Agency CIO) and the date of that change. Additionally, "Date of Last Reported CIO Evaluation" provides the "as of" date of this rating

Evaluation History provides a log of every Evaluation assigned to date by the CIO, the date of the evaluation, and any comments provided explaining the score. Evaluation factors and a scoring table are provided at the bottom of the page.

Rating	Changed Date	Comments
4	02/27/2013	A DIRB re-certification Review will be scheduled during the second quarter of FY 2013.
4	06/11/2012	A Department Investment Review Board (DIRB) meeting was held on March 9, 2012. At this meeting, the NGI program was re-certified. The NGI program is currently on schedule and within budget.
3	11/02/2011	The Department Investment Review Board (DIRB) met in October to review the NGI program. As a result of the DIRB review, the NGI program is being down-graded to a yellow status based on the project utilizing contingency funds to meet increased contractor costs while still remaining within the overall program budget. A follow-on Department Investment Review Board (DIRB) meeting will be held during the second quarter of FY 2012.
4	09/21/2011	The NGI program has been re-scheduled for a Department Investment Review Board (DIRB) meeting in October, 2011.
4	04/30/2011	The NGI program is scheduled for a Department Investment Review Board (DIRB) meeting in August, 2011.
4	03/25/2011	NGI successfully implemented Increment One on time and within budget. Revised Exhibit 300s on NGI and the IAFIS legacy system have been forwarded to OMB.
3	02/23/2011	NGI completed a White House led TechStat review on November 2, 2010 and received approval to move forward with its current plans.

Date of Last Reported CIO Evaluation: March 20, 2013

Note: All descriptions, dates, and costs are as reported by agencies.

Evaluation Factors

The following factors and supporting examples should be used to inform the Evaluation:

Evaluation Factor	Supporting Examples
Risk Management	Risk Management Strategy Exists Risks are well understood by senior leadership Risk log is current and complete Risks are clearly prioritized Mitigation plans are in place to address risks
Requirements Management	Investment objectives are clear and scope is controlled Requirements are complete, clear and validated Appropriate stakeholders are involved in requirements definition
Contractor Oversight	Acquisition strategy is defined and managed via an Integrated Program Team Agency receives key reports, such as earned value reports, current status, and risk logs Agency is providing appropriate management of contractors such that the government is monitoring, controlling, and mitigating the impact of any adverse contract performance
Historical Performance	No significant deviations from planned cost and schedule Lessons learned and best practices are incorporated and adopted
Human Capital	Qualified management and execution team for the IT investments and/or contracts supporting the investment Low turnover rate
Other	Other factors that the CIO deems important to forecasting future success

CIO Evaluations

Rating	Color
5-Low Risk	Green
4-Moderately Low Risk	Green
3-Medium Risk	Yellow
2-Moderately High Risk	Red
1-High-Risk	Red

More About Evaluations

For additional details, please see Questions 7-8 of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)